On Thu, May 28, 2015 at 05:50:35PM +0200, Jean Delvare wrote: > We already skip EDID addresses (0x50-0x57) by default on graphics card > I2C/DDC buses. Also skip 0x37 (DDC/CI) and 0x4f which was recently > reported as corrupting a laptop's display when probed. > > This closes ticket #2392. > http://www.lm-sensors.org/ticket/2392 Looks good. Would it make sense to add a comment somewhere to the Linux kernel, listing addresses which should not be scanned as well as the reasons ? Thanks, Guenter > --- > prog/detect/sensors-detect | 6 ++++-- > 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) > > --- lm-sensors.orig/prog/detect/sensors-detect 2015-05-28 17:15:58.685620089 +0200 > +++ lm-sensors/prog/detect/sensors-detect 2015-05-28 17:46:56.573270434 +0200 > @@ -3943,8 +3943,10 @@ sub scan_i2c_adapter > chomp($input); > @not_to_scan = parse_not_to_scan(0x03, 0x77, $input); > } elsif (($class & 0xff00) == 0x0300) { > - # Skip EDID addresses by default on graphics adapters > - @not_to_scan = parse_not_to_scan(0x03, 0x77, "0x50-0x57"); > + # Skip EDID and DDC/CI addresses by default on graphics > + # adapters. Also skip address 0x4f which was reported in a > + # display corruption case. > + @not_to_scan = parse_not_to_scan(0x03, 0x77, "0x37,0x50-0x57,0x4f"); > } > > open(local *FILE, "$dev_i2c$adapter_nr") or > > > -- > Jean Delvare > SUSE L3 Support > > _______________________________________________ > lm-sensors mailing list > lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
