On Fri, Jan 09, 2015 at 03:45:27PM +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > 2015-01-09 15:34 GMT+01:00 Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > Unfortunately that only applies to INA226 and not INA219, where the time is > > static > > (at least so far). > > Oops, I must have missed this one. > > > I think we'll need to store the time in ina2xx_data and use the old > > (constant) > > value for ina219. Maybe add another variable into the configuration data > > for the initial value and copy it from there during probe. > > I tried to avoid adding another variable used by ina226 only, but > well. It's kind of dull that these chips are supported by a single > driver - their configuration register layout is completely different. > On the other side the data registers are the same. There is always some trade-off. Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors