On Thu, 4 Dec 2014 15:33:47 +0100, Bartosz Golaszewski wrote: > 2014-12-04 15:19 GMT+01:00 Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>: > > The datasheet claims otherwise (0x31, specifically). > > Is this based on real chip information ? > > Can you send me the output from i2cdump for the chip ? > > > > This is what I'm reading: > > # i2cdump -y 1 0x4c > No size specified (using byte-data access) > 0 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 a b c d e f 0123456789abcdef > 00: 1a 1b 00 00 05 55 00 55 00 00 05 55 00 55 00 0d ??..?U.U..?U.U.? > 10: 70 00 00 00 00 90 00 00 00 55 1c XX XX XX XX 00 p....?...U?XXXX. > 20: 55 0a 70 XX XX 0f XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX U?pXX?XXXXXXXXXX > 30: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > 40: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > 50: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > 60: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > 70: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > 80: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > 90: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > a0: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > b0: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > c0: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > d0: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > e0: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XXXXXXXXXXXXXXXX > f0: XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX XX 00 35 55 35 XXXXXXXXXXXX.5U5 > > # i2cget -y 1 0x4c 0xff b > 0x35 That makes sense for a chip named TMP435. Looks like TI forgot to update the value when copying the datasheet from TMP431 to TMP435. Thanks for the dump, by the way :) -- Jean Delvare SUSE L3 Support _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
