On 10/17/2014 07:48 AM, atull wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Thu, Oct 16, 2014 at 01:40:23PM -0500, atull wrote:
On Thu, 16 Oct 2014, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On Wed, Oct 15, 2014 at 01:55:09PM -0500, atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Add support for simple on/off control of each channel.
To add regulator support, the pmbus part driver needs to add
regulator_desc information and number of regulators to its
pmbus_driver_info struct.
regulator_desc can be declared using default macro for a
regulator (PMBUS_REGULATOR) that is in pmbus.h
The regulator_init_data can be initialized from either
platform data or the device tree.
Signed-off-by: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Reviewed-by: Mark Brown <broonie@xxxxxxxxxx>
Cc: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Hi Alan,
I am still seeing lots of the following:
vout0: Failed to create debugfs directory
vout1: Failed to create debugfs directory
vout2: Failed to create debugfs directory
vout3: Failed to create debugfs directory
vout4: Failed to create debugfs directory
vout5: Failed to create debugfs directory
vout6: Failed to create debugfs directory
vout7: Failed to create debugfs directory
I thought there was a problem in the regulator core, but after looking
into it concluded that the regulator core _should_ prepend the names
with the device name when creating the debugfs entries, unless no device
name is specified. So something must be missing. We'll need to sort
this out before I can accept the code.
Thanks,
Guenter
Hi Guenter,
OK, I will look into it.
Can you try the following patch ? It may not be perfect, but it does
the job for me.
Mark, would that patch be acceptable ?
Thanks,
Guenter
---
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
Date: Thu, 16 Oct 2014 13:08:35 -0700
Subject: [PATCH] regulator: Ensure unique regulator debugfs directory names
If multiple regulator devices of the same type exist in a system,
the regulator driver assigns generic names for the regulators it
provides, and debugfs is enabled, the regulator subsystem attempts
to create multiple entries with the same name in the regulator debugfs
directory. This fails for all but the first regulator, resulting in
multiple "Failed to create debugfs directory" log entries.
To avoid the problem, prepend the debugfs directory name for a regulator
with its parent device name if available, but only if no explicit
regulator name was provided.
Cc: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
drivers/regulator/core.c | 13 ++++++++++++-
1 file changed, 12 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/regulator/core.c b/drivers/regulator/core.c
index cd87c0c..92f7a53 100644
--- a/drivers/regulator/core.c
+++ b/drivers/regulator/core.c
@@ -3538,7 +3538,18 @@ static int add_regulator_attributes(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
static void rdev_init_debugfs(struct regulator_dev *rdev)
{
- rdev->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir(rdev_get_name(rdev), debugfs_root);
+ struct device *parent = rdev->dev.parent;
+ const char *rname = rdev_get_name(rdev);
+ char name[NAME_MAX];
+
+ /* Avoid duplicate debugfs directory names */
+ if (parent && rname == rdev->desc->name) {
+ snprintf(name, sizeof(name), "%s-%s", dev_name(parent),
+ rname);
+ rname = name;
+ }
+
+ rdev->debugfs = debugfs_create_dir(rname, debugfs_root);
if (!rdev->debugfs) {
rdev_warn(rdev, "Failed to create debugfs directory\n");
return;
--
1.9.1
Hi Guenter,
I tried it out on a board with two ltc2978's. It looked really good to
me. It solves the debugfs issue without affecting the DT.
root@socfpga_cyclone5:~# ls /sys/kernel/debug/regulator/
0-005c-vout0 0-005c-vout6 0-005e-vout7
0-005c-vout1 0-005c-vout7 FPGA-1.1V
0-005c-vout2 0-005e-vout1 FPGA-1.5V
0-005c-vout3 0-005e-vout3 FPGA-2.5V
0-005c-vout4 0-005e-vout5
reg-dummy-regulator-dummy
0-005c-vout5 0-005e-vout6 supply_map
Alan
Great, thanks a lot for testing.
I'll submit the patch officially. Let's see if Mark accepts it.
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
