On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 01:12:54PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, Oct 08, 2014 at 11:12:29AM -0500, atull wrote: > > > if not specified. We'll have to sort out with the regulator core how this should > > > be handled. > Followup on this: Since the regulator core considers the property to be > mandatory (which I guess makes some sense for a presumed regulator), > you'll have to check in the calling code and ensure that a 'regulators' > entry is there prior to calling the regulator code. We could just lower the severity of the message, it's not mandatory at all but rather there so that users can figure out what's going wrong if we fail to parse.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
