On 10/03/2014 06:05 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 02:03:23PM +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote:
On 10/03/2014 05:27 AM, Mark Rutland wrote:
On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 07:37:48PM +0100, atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote:
From: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
Add device tree bindings documentation for ltc2978.
Signed-off-by: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx>
---
v2: clean whitespace
---
.../devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ltc2978.txt | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++
1 file changed, 41 insertions(+)
create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ltc2978.txt
diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ltc2978.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ltc2978.txt
new file mode 100644
index 0000000..b2d9c4d
--- /dev/null
+++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ltc2978.txt
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
+ltc2978
+
+Required properties:
+ - compatible: one of: ltc2974, ltc2977, ltc2978, ltc3880, ltc3883, ltm4676
Could we please format this like:
- compatible: should contain one of:
* "ltc2974"
* "ltc2977"
* "ltc2978"
* "ltc3880"
* "ltc3883"
* "ltm4676"
Given the file name, are these all variants of ltc2978?
All the chips supported by the ltc2978 driver. Some are variants
of the ltc2978, some have different functionality.
Ok.
[ should those be "linear,ltc2974" and so on ? ]
Good point; yes they should. That will need a vendor-prefixes.txt
addition.
Actually, turns out there already is one, only it is not immediately obvious:
lltc for "Linear Technology Corporation".
Guenter
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
