On Fri, Oct 03, 2014 at 02:03:23PM +0100, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On 10/03/2014 05:27 AM, Mark Rutland wrote: > > On Thu, Oct 02, 2014 at 07:37:48PM +0100, atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx wrote: > >> From: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> > >> Add device tree bindings documentation for ltc2978. > >> > >> Signed-off-by: Alan Tull <atull@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > >> --- > >> v2: clean whitespace > >> --- > >> .../devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ltc2978.txt | 41 ++++++++++++++++++++ > >> 1 file changed, 41 insertions(+) > >> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ltc2978.txt > >> > >> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ltc2978.txt b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ltc2978.txt > >> new file mode 100644 > >> index 0000000..b2d9c4d > >> --- /dev/null > >> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/hwmon/ltc2978.txt > >> @@ -0,0 +1,41 @@ > >> +ltc2978 > >> + > >> +Required properties: > >> + - compatible: one of: ltc2974, ltc2977, ltc2978, ltc3880, ltc3883, ltm4676 > > > > Could we please format this like: > > > > - compatible: should contain one of: > > * "ltc2974" > > * "ltc2977" > > * "ltc2978" > > * "ltc3880" > > * "ltc3883" > > * "ltm4676" > > > > Given the file name, are these all variants of ltc2978? > > > > All the chips supported by the ltc2978 driver. Some are variants > of the ltc2978, some have different functionality. Ok. > > [ should those be "linear,ltc2974" and so on ? ] Good point; yes they should. That will need a vendor-prefixes.txt addition. _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
