On 08/25/2014 07:10 PM, Eduardo Valentin wrote:
> On Mon, Aug 25, 2014 at 02:29:48PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
>> From: lightning314 <wni@xxxxxxxxxx>
>>
>> Add dt node to describe the thermal zone for the nct1008.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>> arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114-dalmore.dts | 20 +++++++++++++++++++-
>> 1 file changed, 19 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114-dalmore.dts b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114-dalmore.dts
>> index 5c21d21..94a1b5d 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114-dalmore.dts
>> +++ b/arch/arm/boot/dts/tegra114-dalmore.dts
>> @@ -779,12 +779,14 @@
>> <&gpio TEGRA_GPIO(V, 3) GPIO_ACTIVE_HIGH>;
>> };
>>
>> - temperature-sensor@4c {
>> + nct1008: temperature-sensor@4c {
>> compatible = "onnn,nct1008";
>> reg = <0x4c>;
>> vcc-supply = <&palmas_ldo6_reg>;
>> interrupt-parent = <&gpio>;
>> interrupts = <TEGRA_GPIO(O, 4) IRQ_TYPE_LEVEL_LOW>;
>> +
>> + #thermal-sensor-cells = <1>;
>> };
>> };
>>
>> @@ -1283,4 +1285,20 @@
>> <&tegra_car TEGRA114_CLK_EXTERN1>;
>> clock-names = "pll_a", "pll_a_out0", "mclk";
>> };
>> +
>> + thermal-zones {
>> + nct1008-local {
>
> at this level, can the thermal zone name be a meaningful string? What
> part of the hardware does the local and remote monitors the the dalmore
> platform?
Oh, yes, you are right.
I think it's better to use "board_thermal_sensor: nct1008-local" and
"diode_thermal_sensor: nct1008-remote".
Thanks.
Wei.
>
>> + polling-delay-passive = <2000>; /* milliseconds */
>> + polling-delay = <0>; /* milliseconds */
>> +
>> + thermal-sensors = <&nct1008 0>;
>> + };
>> +
>> + nct1008-remote {
>> + polling-delay-passive = <1000>; /* milliseconds */
>> + polling-delay = <0>; /* milliseconds */
>> +
>> + thermal-sensors = <&nct1008 1>;
>> + };
>> + };
>> };
>> --
>> 1.8.1.5
>>
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
