On 24 March 2014 03:39, Guenter Roeck wrote: >On 03/23/2014 01:37 PM, Opensource [Steve Twiss] wrote: >> From: Opensource [Steve Twiss] <stwiss.opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> >> Add the HWMON driver for DA9063 >> >> Signed-off-by: Opensource [Steve Twiss] <stwiss.opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx> >> --- >> Checks performed with linux-next/next-20140321/scripts/checkpatch.pl >> da9063-hwmon.c total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 456 lines checked >> Kconfig total: 1 errors, 3 warnings, 1643 lines checked >> Makefile total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 154 lines checked >> registers.h total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1066 lines checked >> There are errors and warning in Kconfig, however they are not caused >> by this patch. >> >> This is the hardware monitor driver component for DA9063 PMIC. >> >> The manual measurement allows monitoring of the system voltage >> VSYS, the auxiliary channels ADCIN1, ADCIN2 and ADCIN3, VBBAT >> measures of the backup battery voltage and a Tjunc value for the >> internal junction temperature sensor. >> > >At least this part belongs into the summary. > >After browsing through patch 2/3, I got suspicious and tried to compile >the driver after applying this patch. > >Here is the result: > >drivers/hwmon/da9063-hwmon.c: In function 'da9063_adc_manual_read': >drivers/hwmon/da9063-hwmon.c:155:2: warning: suggest parentheses around >comparison in operand of '&' [-Wparentheses] >drivers/hwmon/da9063-hwmon.c: In function 'da9063_hwmon_probe': >drivers/hwmon/da9063-hwmon.c:386:14: error: 'struct da9063_pdata' has no >member named 'hwmon_pdata' >drivers/hwmon/da9063-hwmon.c:387:14: error: 'struct da9063_pdata' has no >member named 'hwmon_pdata' >drivers/hwmon/da9063-hwmon.c:388:14: error: 'struct da9063_pdata' has no >member named 'hwmon_pdata' >drivers/hwmon/da9063-hwmon.c:417:50: error: 'struct da9063' has no member >named 't_offset' >make[1]: *** [drivers/hwmon/da9063-hwmon.o] Error 1 >make: *** [drivers/hwmon/da9063-hwmon.ko] Error 2 > >Please make sure that each patch, if applied one after another, compiles. >Patch 1/3 must not depend on patch 2/3. Hi Guenter, Thank you for this fast response. Ah, the dependencies were not in order. I will check for that in future. I will also look into using the API with devm_hwmon_device_register_with_groups and will resubmit with a RFC V2 later. Thank you, Steve > >Thanks, >Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors