Re: [RFC V1 1/3] hwmon: da9063: HWMON driver

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 03/23/2014 01:37 PM, Opensource [Steve Twiss] wrote:
From: Opensource [Steve Twiss] <stwiss.opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx>

Add the HWMON driver for DA9063

Signed-off-by: Opensource [Steve Twiss] <stwiss.opensource@xxxxxxxxxxx>
---
Checks performed with linux-next/next-20140321/scripts/checkpatch.pl
  da9063-hwmon.c            total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 456 lines checked
  Kconfig                   total: 1 errors, 3 warnings, 1643 lines checked
  Makefile                  total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 154 lines checked
  registers.h               total: 0 errors, 0 warnings, 1066 lines checked
There are errors and warning in Kconfig, however they are not caused
by this patch.

This is the hardware monitor driver component for DA9063 PMIC.

The manual measurement allows monitoring of the system voltage
VSYS, the auxiliary channels ADCIN1, ADCIN2 and ADCIN3, VBBAT
measures of the backup battery voltage and a Tjunc value for the
internal junction temperature sensor.


At least this part belongs into the summary.

After browsing through patch 2/3, I got suspicious and tried to compile
the driver after applying this patch.

Here is the result:

drivers/hwmon/da9063-hwmon.c: In function 'da9063_adc_manual_read':
drivers/hwmon/da9063-hwmon.c:155:2: warning: suggest parentheses around comparison in operand of '&' [-Wparentheses]
drivers/hwmon/da9063-hwmon.c: In function 'da9063_hwmon_probe':
drivers/hwmon/da9063-hwmon.c:386:14: error: 'struct da9063_pdata' has no member named 'hwmon_pdata'
drivers/hwmon/da9063-hwmon.c:387:14: error: 'struct da9063_pdata' has no member named 'hwmon_pdata'
drivers/hwmon/da9063-hwmon.c:388:14: error: 'struct da9063_pdata' has no member named 'hwmon_pdata'
drivers/hwmon/da9063-hwmon.c:417:50: error: 'struct da9063' has no member named 't_offset'
make[1]: *** [drivers/hwmon/da9063-hwmon.o] Error 1
make: *** [drivers/hwmon/da9063-hwmon.ko] Error 2

Please make sure that each patch, if applied one after another, compiles.
Patch 1/3 must not depend on patch 2/3.

Thanks,
Guenter


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux