Re: [PATCH] hwmon: (lm90) Add support for TI TMP451

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 10/08/2013 11:25 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Tue, Oct 08, 2013 at 05:27:37PM +0800, Wei Ni wrote:
>> TI TMP451 is mostly compatible with ADT7461, except for
>> local temperature low byte and max conversion rate.
>> Add support to the LM90 driver.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Wei Ni <wni@xxxxxxxxxx>
>> ---
>>  Documentation/hwmon/lm90 |    6 ++++++
>>  drivers/hwmon/lm90.c     |   37 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--------
>>  2 files changed, 35 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>>
>> diff --git a/Documentation/hwmon/lm90 b/Documentation/hwmon/lm90
>> index b466974..e40af89 100644
>> --- a/Documentation/hwmon/lm90
>> +++ b/Documentation/hwmon/lm90
>> @@ -122,6 +122,12 @@ Supported chips:
>>      Prefix: 'g781'
>>      Addresses scanned: I2C 0x4c, 0x4d
>>      Datasheet: Not publicly available from GMT
>> +  * Texas Instruments TMP451
>> +    Prefix: 'tmp451'
>> +    Addresses scanned: I2C 0x4c
>> +    Datasheet: Publicly available at NXP website
> 
> s/NXP/TI/

Oh, will change it.

> 
>> +               http://www.ti.com/litv/pdf/sbos686
>> +
>>  
>>  Author: Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx>
>>  
>> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> index 82a1ca15..81a7bf6 100644
>> --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm90.c
>> @@ -60,6 +60,11 @@
>>   * This driver also supports the G781 from GMT. This device is compatible
>>   * with the ADM1032.
>>   *
>> + * This driver also supports TMP451 from Texas Instruments. This device is
>> + * supported in both compatibility and extended mode. it's mostly compatible
> 
> s/it/It/

Got it.

> 
>> + * with ADT7461 except for local temperature low byte register and max
>> + * conversion rate.
>> + *
>>   * Since the LM90 was the first chipset supported by this driver, most
>>   * comments will refer to this chipset, but are actually general and
>>   * concern all supported chipsets, unless mentioned otherwise.
>> @@ -111,7 +116,7 @@ static const unsigned short normal_i2c[] = {
>>  	0x4d, 0x4e, 0x4f, I2C_CLIENT_END };
>>  
>>  enum chips { lm90, adm1032, lm99, lm86, max6657, max6659, adt7461, max6680,
>> -	max6646, w83l771, max6696, sa56004, g781 };
>> +	max6646, w83l771, max6696, sa56004, g781, tmp451 };
>>  
>>  /*
>>   * The LM90 registers
>> @@ -168,6 +173,9 @@ enum chips { lm90, adm1032, lm99, lm86, max6657, max6659, adt7461, max6680,
>>  #define LM90_DEF_CONVRATE_RVAL	6	/* Def conversion rate register value */
>>  #define LM90_MAX_CONVRATE_MS	16000	/* Maximum conversion rate in ms */
>>  
>> +/* TMP451 registers */
>> +#define TMP451_REG_R_LOCAL_TEMPL	0x15
>> +
>>  /*
>>   * Device flags
>>   */
>> @@ -206,6 +214,7 @@ static const struct i2c_device_id lm90_id[] = {
>>  	{ "nct1008", adt7461 },
>>  	{ "w83l771", w83l771 },
>>  	{ "sa56004", sa56004 },
>> +	{ "tmp451", tmp451},
> 
> 	Addd space before } for consistency
> 
>>  	{ }
>>  };
>>  MODULE_DEVICE_TABLE(i2c, lm90_id);
>> @@ -294,6 +303,13 @@ static const struct lm90_params lm90_params[] = {
>>  		.max_convrate = 9,
>>  		.reg_local_ext = SA56004_REG_R_LOCAL_TEMPL,
>>  	},
>> +	[tmp451] = {
>> +		.flags = LM90_HAVE_OFFSET | LM90_HAVE_REM_LIMIT_EXT
>> +		  | LM90_HAVE_BROKEN_ALERT,
>> +		.alert_alarms = 0x7c,
>> +		.max_convrate = 9,
>> +		.reg_local_ext = TMP451_REG_R_LOCAL_TEMPL,
>> +	}
>>  };
>>  
>>  /*
>> @@ -718,7 +734,7 @@ static int read_temp8(struct device *dev, int index)
>>  	struct lm90_data *data = lm90_update_device(dev);
>>  	int temp;
>>  
>> -	if (data->kind == adt7461)
>> +	if (data->kind == adt7461 || data->kind == tmp451)
>>  		temp = temp_from_u8_adt7461(data, data->temp8[index]);
>>  	else if (data->kind == max6646)
>>  		temp = temp_from_u8(data->temp8[index]);
>> @@ -762,7 +778,7 @@ static int write_temp8(struct device *dev, int index, long val)
>>  		val -= 16000;
>>  
>>  	mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> -	if (data->kind == adt7461)
>> +	if (data->kind == adt7461 || data->kind == tmp451)
>>  		data->temp8[index] = temp_to_u8_adt7461(data, val);
>>  	else if (data->kind == max6646)
>>  		data->temp8[index] = temp_to_u8(val);
>> @@ -803,7 +819,7 @@ static int read_temp11(struct device *dev, int index)
>>  	struct lm90_data *data = lm90_update_device(dev);
>>  	int temp;
>>  
>> -	if (data->kind == adt7461)
>> +	if (data->kind == adt7461 || data->kind == tmp451)
>>  		temp = temp_from_u16_adt7461(data, data->temp11[index]);
>>  	else if (data->kind == max6646)
>>  		temp = temp_from_u16(data->temp11[index]);
>> @@ -848,7 +864,7 @@ static int write_temp11(struct device *dev, int nr, int index, long val)
>>  		val -= 16000;
>>  
>>  	mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> -	if (data->kind == adt7461)
>> +	if (data->kind == adt7461 || data->kind == tmp451)
>>  		data->temp11[index] = temp_to_u16_adt7461(data, val);
>>  	else if (data->kind == max6646)
>>  		data->temp11[index] = temp_to_u8(val) << 8;
>> @@ -912,7 +928,7 @@ static ssize_t show_temphyst(struct device *dev,
>>  	struct lm90_data *data = lm90_update_device(dev);
>>  	int temp;
>>  
>> -	if (data->kind == adt7461)
>> +	if (data->kind == adt7461 || data->kind == tmp451)
>>  		temp = temp_from_u8_adt7461(data, data->temp8[attr->index]);
>>  	else if (data->kind == max6646)
>>  		temp = temp_from_u8(data->temp8[attr->index]);
>> @@ -940,7 +956,7 @@ static ssize_t set_temphyst(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *dummy,
>>  		return err;
>>  
>>  	mutex_lock(&data->update_lock);
>> -	if (data->kind == adt7461)
>> +	if (data->kind == adt7461 || data->kind == tmp451)
>>  		temp = temp_from_u8_adt7461(data, data->temp8[2]);
>>  	else if (data->kind == max6646)
>>  		temp = temp_from_u8(data->temp8[2]);
>> @@ -1368,6 +1384,11 @@ static int lm90_detect(struct i2c_client *client,
>>  		 && (config1 & 0x3F) == 0x00
>>  		 && convrate <= 0x08)
>>  			name = "g781";
>> +	} else
>> +	if (address == 0x4C
>> +	 && man_id == 0x55) { /* Texas Instruments */
>> +		if (chip_id == 0x00)
>> +			name = "tmp451";
> 
> Chip ID register is not defined for TMP451. Even if it is readable, not sure if
> you can rely on it. Guess we have to, as other TI chips _do_ have this register
> and might be mis-detected otherwise. Anyway, I think you should add additional
> checks as with other chips. Conversion rate limits are known, as well as
> forced-zero bits in the configuration register. You could also read register
> 0x15 to ensure that it is readable and has the lower 4 bits set to 0.

Yes, you are right, I will do it.

> 
>>  	}
>>  
>>  	if (!name) { /* identification failed */
>> @@ -1429,7 +1450,7 @@ static void lm90_init_client(struct i2c_client *client)
>>  	data->config_orig = config;
>>  
>>  	/* Check Temperature Range Select */
>> -	if (data->kind == adt7461) {
>> +	if (data->kind == adt7461 || data->kind == tmp451) {
>>  		if (config & 0x04)
>>  			data->flags |= LM90_FLAG_ADT7461_EXT;
>>  	}
>> -- 
>> 1.7.9.5
>>
>>


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors




[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux