On Fri, Sep 27, 2013 at 10:01:36PM +0200, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > On 09/27/2013 09:22 PM, Mark Brown wrote: > > Indeed. I don't think that's terribly well thought through though, > > especially not now we have annotations for endianness (as you noticed!). > I wouldn't mind updating spi_w8r16() to do the conversion to big-endian. > Especially considering that a driver using the function will probably always > need to do a endian conversion anyway to work correctly on both > endiannesses. We can add a LE variant if we should ever need it. I think that's probably the way to go, the API seems to error prone as it is.
Attachment:
signature.asc
Description: Digital signature
_______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
