On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 11:26:33PM +0200, Simon Guinot wrote: > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 01:53:21PM -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Wed, Jun 19, 2013 at 10:15:56PM +0200, Arnaud Ebalard wrote: > > > Hi Simon, > > > > > > Simon Guinot <simon.guinot@xxxxxxxxxxxx> writes: > > > > > > > I have tested this patch on my 2Big Network v2 board. > > > > > > > > Sometimes I get a weird "No such device" error while reading or writing > > > > the hwmon sysfs attributes. For example: > > > > > > > > # cat pwm1 > > > > cat: read error: No such device > > > > # cat pwm1 > > > > 0 > > > > > This is odd, since ENODEV should not be returned as error code from i2c read > > operations. > > > > What is the i2c controller ? > > The controller is the very same as for the ReadyNAS Duo v2. It is built > in the Marvell Kirkwood SoC and the driver is i2c-mv64xxx. > > I will try an another board to see if I reproduce the error. > Might be a flaky i2c connection or a problematic board. The i2c-mv64xxx driver does return ENODEV in error cases. I submitted a patch to change it to ENXIO; we'll see if it gets accepted. Guenter > Regards, > > Simon > > > > > Thanks, > > Guenter > > > > > Weird, I cannot reproduce that at all on my ReadyNAS Duo v2. > > > > > > > Note, that if the same command is executed again (just after the faulty > > > > one), then it will succeed most of the time. The errors seems to happen > > > > quite randomly and not very often. I'd say one time over ten tries. > > > > I suppose this error is now visible due to the enhanced error path in > > > > g762_update_client. It looks like we learn something by checking the > > > > return value for i2c_smbus_read_byte_data :) > > > > > > > > Except that, all is working as expected. This new version fixes > > > > effectively open-loop driving when the set_cnt register is set to 0xff. > > > > > > > > Also I am planning (hopefully this Wednesday) to test your patch on my > > > > 5Big Network v2 board. This last also embed a g762 controller but with a > > > > three wires fan instead. Then, I should be able to test the closed-loop > > > > mode behaviour. > > > > > > Thanks for your tests, Simon. > > > > > > Cheers, > > > > > > a+ > > > _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
