> On Wednesday 05 June 2013, Alexander Shiyan wrote: > > Well, let's leave the kconfig symbol as is. But about the rest, that mc13783_* > > symbols in the log (debug) will say a developer who does not know about > > mc13892 compatibility with mc13783? I still believe that this should be reflected. > > If the log messages use dev_printk, they will use the correct device name already, > if not, that can be fixed. > > I agree with Jean: we don't just rename things unless there is a significant > benefit, which I don't see here. There is also the risk that we need to support > a different chip named mc13xxx in the future that is different enough to require > a new driver and then the naming is even more screwed up. It is a pity that the revision and updating of the code of this driver died. Well, lets drop thesepatches. Thanks. --- _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
