On Thu, May 09, 2013 at 09:15:00PM +0200, Rafael J. Wysocki wrote: > On Thursday, May 09, 2013 10:09:23 AM Guenter Roeck wrote: > > The following patch series introduces a marker for power management functions > > and data. This this marker, #ifdef CONFIG_PM and #ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP > > can be removed from most of the code. This ensures that the conditional code > > still compiles but is not included in the object file. > > > > As a side effect, drivers declaring struct dev_pm_ops unconditionally > > get a bit smaller if CONFIG_PM_SLEEP is not configured. > > > > The first patch in the series introduces the marker, the following > > two patches introduce the marker in two drivers to demonstrate its use. > > > > The patch series depends on the "PM: Add pm_ops_ptr() macro" patch > > submitted by Jingoo Han. > > What about CCing a PM core maintainer? > Actually, that was the idea. Somehow my send script got screwed up. No idea what happened. Sorry for that. Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
