On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 01:46:52PM -0800, Doug Anderson wrote: > Lars / Guenter, > > On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > On 01/29/2013 10:05 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: > >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:10:25PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: > >>> I wrote in another mail a few days ago, how I think dt bindings for IIO could > >>> be implemented. The basic idea was to simply use bindings very similar to what > >>> the clk API uses, since its provider/consumer structure actually matches what > >>> we do in IIO pretty good. > >>> > >>> The full mail can be found here: > >>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-iio&m=135902119507483&w=2 > >>> > >> Hi Lars, > >> > >> looks like a good idea. > >> > >> Do you know if anyone is working on an implementation ? > >> Otherwise I'll give it a shot. > > > > I unfortunately dont have time for this atm, but maybe Naveen or Dou is working > > on it. Added them to Cc. > > I believe Naveen was going to work on this but I found out this > morning that he had to go on leave for some days so I'm not sure when > he might respond. If you want to take a whack at implementing the > bindings I don't think he would mind, though. ...then he'd be able to > build on the same bindings to get the Samsung ADC working. :) > Ok, I'll see what I can come up with. Thanks, Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
