Lars / Guenter, On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 1:21 PM, Lars-Peter Clausen <lars@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 01/29/2013 10:05 PM, Guenter Roeck wrote: >> On Tue, Jan 29, 2013 at 09:10:25PM +0100, Lars-Peter Clausen wrote: >>> I wrote in another mail a few days ago, how I think dt bindings for IIO could >>> be implemented. The basic idea was to simply use bindings very similar to what >>> the clk API uses, since its provider/consumer structure actually matches what >>> we do in IIO pretty good. >>> >>> The full mail can be found here: >>> http://marc.info/?l=linux-iio&m=135902119507483&w=2 >>> >> Hi Lars, >> >> looks like a good idea. >> >> Do you know if anyone is working on an implementation ? >> Otherwise I'll give it a shot. > > I unfortunately dont have time for this atm, but maybe Naveen or Dou is working > on it. Added them to Cc. I believe Naveen was going to work on this but I found out this morning that he had to go on leave for some days so I'm not sure when he might respond. If you want to take a whack at implementing the bindings I don't think he would mind, though. ...then he'd be able to build on the same bindings to get the Samsung ADC working. :) -Doug _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
