Re: f71882fg not showing motherboard temps

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Wed, Oct 31, 2012 at 06:37:01PM -0400, Logan Freijo wrote:
> **Hello. I have a system running Ubuntu Server 12.04.1 on a Jetway
> motherboard. Sensors-detect finds my AMD cpu temp and a chip for the
> motherboard (f71882fg). However, after adding the suggested line to
> /etc/modules and rebooting, only the cpu temp shows up using the
> sensors command. I have tried acpi-enforce-resources=lax with no
> effect. I have tried searching the internet for an answer and I find
> none. Below is the information requested in the FAQ.  I would like
> to note that this is not a new problem, it has been ongoing since I
> bought the motherboard in Jan 2011.
> 
> Any help would be appreciated.
> 
> Logan
> 
> 
> *
> 
> Motherboard vendor and model*
>     JetWay JHZ03-GT-LF
> 
> *Lm_sensors and kernel versions*
>     sensors version 3.3.1 with libsensors version 3.3.1
>     3.2.0-32-generic #51-Ubuntu SMP Wed Sep 26 21:33:09 UTC 2012
> x86_64 x86_64 x86_64 GNU/Linux
> 
> *The output of sensors*
>     k10temp-pci-00c3
>     Adapter: PCI adapter
>     CPU Temp:     +26.0 C  (high = +70.0 C)
> 
> *The dmesg or syslog output if applicable*
>     kernel: [    8.795196] f71882fg: Found f71882fg chip at 0x220,
> revision 32
>     kernel: [    8.795228] f71882fg.544: failed to claim resource 0
>     kernel: [    8.795233] f71882fg: Device addition failed
> 
Hi,

An old post suggests that you may be able to work around the problem by booting
with "pnpacpi=off", and that the problem might be due to a BIOS problem.
See http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2009-January/025175.html
and subsequent posts for additional details.

Might be worth a try.

Guenter

> *The output of (as root) sensors-detect*
> # sensors-detect revision 5984 (2011-07-10 21:22:53 +0200)
> # System: To Be Filled By O.E.M. To Be Filled By O.E.M.
> # Board: JETWAY HZ03-GT
> 
> This program will help you determine which kernel modules you need
> to load to use lm_sensors most effectively. It is generally safe
> and recommended to accept the default answers to all questions,
> unless you know what you're doing.
> 
> Some south bridges, CPUs or memory controllers contain embedded sensors.
> Do you want to scan for them? This is totally safe. (YES/no):
> Module cpuid loaded successfully.
> Silicon Integrated Systems SIS5595...                       No
> VIA VT82C686 Integrated Sensors...                          No
> VIA VT8231 Integrated Sensors...                            No
> AMD K8 thermal sensors...                                   No
> AMD Family 10h thermal sensors...                           Success!
>     (driver `k10temp')
> AMD Family 11h thermal sensors...                           No
> AMD Family 12h and 14h thermal sensors...                   No
> AMD Family 15h thermal sensors...                           No
> AMD Family 15h power sensors...                             No
> Intel digital thermal sensor...                             No
> Intel AMB FB-DIMM thermal sensor...                         No
> VIA C7 thermal sensor...                                    No
> VIA Nano thermal sensor...                                  No
> 
> Some Super I/O chips contain embedded sensors. We have to write to
> standard I/O ports to probe them. This is usually safe.
> Do you want to scan for Super I/O sensors? (YES/no):
> Probing for Super-I/O at 0x2e/0x2f
> Trying family `National Semiconductor/ITE'...               No
> Trying family `SMSC'...                                     No
> Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'...               Yes
> Found `Fintek F71882FG/F71883FG Super IO Sensors'           Success!
>     (address 0x225, driver `f71882fg')
> Probing for Super-I/O at 0x4e/0x4f
> Trying family `National Semiconductor/ITE'...               No
> Trying family `SMSC'...                                     No
> Trying family `VIA/Winbond/Nuvoton/Fintek'...               No
> Trying family `ITE'...                                      No
> 
> Some systems (mainly servers) implement IPMI, a set of common interfaces
> through which system health data may be retrieved, amongst other things.
> We first try to get the information from SMBIOS. If we don't find it
> there, we have to read from arbitrary I/O ports to probe for such
> interfaces. This is normally safe. Do you want to scan for IPMI
> interfaces? (YES/no):
> Probing for `IPMI BMC KCS' at 0xca0...                      No
> Probing for `IPMI BMC SMIC' at 0xca8...                     No
> 
> Some hardware monitoring chips are accessible through the ISA I/O ports.
> We have to write to arbitrary I/O ports to probe them. This is usually
> safe though. Yes, you do have ISA I/O ports even if you do not have any
> ISA slots! Do you want to scan the ISA I/O ports? (yes/NO):
> 
> Lastly, we can probe the I2C/SMBus adapters for connected hardware
> monitoring devices. This is the most risky part, and while it works
> reasonably well on most systems, it has been reported to cause trouble
> on some systems.
> Do you want to probe the I2C/SMBus adapters now? (YES/no):
> Using driver `i2c-piix4' for device 0000:00:14.0: ATI Technologies
> Inc SB600/SB700/SB800 SMBus
> Module i2c-dev loaded successfully.
> 
> Next adapter: Radeon i2c bit bus 0x90 (i2c-0)
> Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):
> Client found at address 0x50
> Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1033'...                     No
> Probing for `Analog Devices ADM1034'...                     No
> Probing for `SPD EEPROM'...                                 No
> Probing for `EDID EEPROM'...                                Yes
>     (confidence 8, not a hardware monitoring chip)
> 
> Next adapter: Radeon i2c bit bus 0x91 (i2c-1)
> Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):
> 
> Next adapter: Radeon i2c bit bus 0x92 (i2c-2)
> Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):
> 
> Next adapter: Radeon i2c bit bus 0x93 (i2c-3)
> Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):
> 
> Next adapter: Radeon i2c bit bus 0x14 (i2c-4)
> Do you want to scan it? (YES/no/selectively):
> 
> Now follows a summary of the probes I have just done.
> Just press ENTER to continue:
> 
> Driver `k10temp' (autoloaded):
>   * Chip `AMD Family 10h thermal sensors' (confidence: 9)
> 
> Driver `f71882fg':
>   * ISA bus, address 0x225
>     Chip `Fintek F71882FG/F71883FG Super IO Sensors' (confidence: 9)
> 
> To load everything that is needed, add this to /etc/modules:
> #----cut here----
> # Chip drivers
> f71882fg
> #----cut here----
> If you have some drivers built into your kernel, the list above will
> contain too many modules. Skip the appropriate ones!
> 
> Do you want to add these lines automatically to /etc/modules? (yes/NO)n
> 
> Unloading i2c-dev... OK
> Unloading cpuid... OK
> 
> *The output of lsmod*
> 
> Module                  Size  Used by
> cifs                  287317  0
> ext2                   73795  1
> dm_multipath           23230  0
> psmouse                97443  0
> edac_core              53746  0
> radeon                804460  1
> serio_raw              13211  0
> k10temp                13166  0
> edac_mce_amd           23709  0
> ttm                    76949  1 radeon
> sp5100_tco             13791  0
> drm_kms_helper         46978  1 radeon
> joydev                 17693  0
> i2c_piix4              13301  0
> drm                   241921  3 radeon,ttm,drm_kms_helper
> i2c_algo_bit           13423  1 radeon
> mac_hid                13253  0
> shpchp                 37277  0
> wmi                    19256  0
> lp                     17799  0
> parport                46562  1 lp
> usbhid                 47199  1
> hid                    99559  1 usbhid
> r8169                  62099  0
> pata_atiixp            13204  4
> dm_raid45              78155  0
> xor                    12894  1 dm_raid45
> dm_mirror              22203  0
> dm_region_hash         20918  1 dm_mirror
> dm_log                 18564  3 dm_raid45,dm_mirror,dm_region_hash
> 
> _______________________________________________
> lm-sensors mailing list
> lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
> 

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux