On Wed, Jun 13, 2012 at 9:35 PM, Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
On Wed, 13 Jun 2012 06:51:32 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote:fe61e07e9ebc890c70d97a1f72ddaad4bee2d848 is certainly relevant too,
> I suspect it requires additional patches to work. Jean might know.
> fe61e07e9ebc890c70d97a1f72ddaad4bee2d848 seems relevant, and there may be others,
> even infrastructure changes.
yes. I can't think of anything else, but that was long ago, so I could
miss something else.
This would seem reasonable, yes, 2.6.34 is getting very old and
> Can you switch to a more recent kernel ?
unsupported, and it did not even support I2C multiplexing so I take it
that you already did a fair amount of backport to get to the kernel
you're currently running. No real surprise you get into trouble...
--
Jean Delvare
Yes, as you had mentioned we just backported I2c mux support.
I planning to use linux-2.6.39.4.tar.bz2 kernel (Since I cant go to 3.x kernels for now).
Is that version is fine with I2c mux devices or do I have to go with 3.x kernels.?
Thanks
Sasi
_______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
