On Sun, Jun 10, 2012 at 9:06 PM, Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
Yes, I have PCA9545 Mux device. LM75 device was connected to PCA9545 Mux devices (Mux device
is connected to SMBUS). At first I unloaded PCA954x module, It hanged at lm75_remove. Later I had
to tried remove the lm75 device using sysfs, again it hanged at same location. Both PCA Mux device and
lm75 devvice instantiated using sysfs new_device.
(Note: Frodo is out of the lm-sensors project for years, no need to Cc
him.)
I can't reproduce this with kernel 3.4.2.
On Sun, 10 Jun 2012 07:41:03 -0700, Sasikanth babu wrote:
> when I'm trying to delete lm75 device using sysfs delete_device attribute
> (echo 0x4e >/sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-3/delete_device)
> It hangs at lm75_remove function. I started the device using sysfs
> attribute new_device.
>
>
> Kernel verion : 2.6.34.12
Did you try reproducing this with a more recent kernel? 2.6.34 is
getting old.
Is there anything you can think of which makes your system special? I2C
bus multiplexing ? Some unusual kernel option maybe?
Yes, I have PCA9545 Mux device. LM75 device was connected to PCA9545 Mux devices (Mux device
is connected to SMBUS). At first I unloaded PCA954x module, It hanged at lm75_remove. Later I had
to tried remove the lm75 device using sysfs, again it hanged at same location. Both PCA Mux device and
lm75 devvice instantiated using sysfs new_device.
This looks odd, sysfs_remove_group() doesn't call
> "echo 0 > /proc/sys/kernel/hung_task_timeout_secs" disables this message.
> i2cinit D ffffffff814a04e0 0 2064 2059 0x00000004
> ffff880271928a70 0000000000000086 0000000000000096 ffff880273215b48
> ffff8802ffffffff ffff880477306a70 0000000000010140 ffff880273215fd8
> 0000000000010140 ffff880271928a70 ffff880273215fd8 ffff880273215fd8
> Call Trace:
> [<ffffffff8103ecd0>] ? default_wake_function+0x0/0x20
> [<ffffffff8148765f>] ? __rt_mutex_slowlock+0x4f/0x110
> [<ffffffff814879e3>] ? rt_mutex_slowlock+0x93/0x190
> [<ffffffff813278d9>] ? i2c_smbus_xfer+0x49/0x110
> [<ffffffff814e1de0>] ? dev_sysfs_ops+0x0/0x10
> [<ffffffff81327c40>] ? i2c_smbus_write_byte_data+0x30/0x40
i2c_smbus_write_byte_data(), and i2c_smbus_write_byte_data() doesn't
touch dev_sysfs_ops... So this stack trace is approximate.
--
> [<ffffffff811361f9>] ? sysfs_remove_group+0x59/0x100
> [<ffffffff8132ec2d>] ? lm75_remove+0x4d/0x80
> [<ffffffff81326ef9>] ? i2c_device_remove+0xa9/0xc0
> [<ffffffff8129ffb6>] ? __device_release_driver+0x56/0xc0
> [<ffffffff812a00f5>] ? device_release_driver+0x25/0x40
> [<ffffffff8129f481>] ? bus_remove_device+0x91/0xc0
> [<ffffffff8129d7a8>] ? device_del+0x118/0x190
> [<ffffffff8129d829>] ? device_unregister+0x9/0x20
> [<ffffffff813281bc>] ? i2c_sysfs_delete_device+0x17c/0x200
> [<ffffffff81133046>] ? sysfs_write_file+0x1c6/0x260
> [<ffffffff810d5323>] ? vfs_write+0x103/0x200
> [<ffffffff810d550e>] ? sys_write+0x4e/0x90
> [<ffffffff814884e4>] ? page_fault+0x24/0x30
> [<ffffffff810024ab>] ? system_call_done+0x0/0x5
Jean Delvare
_______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
