On Fri, Jun 01, 2012 at 10:06:57AM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:37:55 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > > Now that we've a common watchdog core, I would also like to convert the > > fschmd watchdog code to it (one of these days). Which raises the question > > through which tree should that conversion go in. fschmd is primarily a hwmon > > driver, but the changes will only touch the watchdog part... > > > > I guess it would be best to get the conversion in to Wim's tree, even though > > that slightly increases the chance of conflicts. The fschmd driver does not see > > a lot of churn, and I think Wim is a better reviewer for watchdog related > > patches :) > > Chances of conflicts are so thin, I vote for getting it through Wim's > watchdog tree. > Ok with me. Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
