On Fri, 01 Jun 2012 15:37:55 +0200, Hans de Goede wrote: > Now that we've a common watchdog core, I would also like to convert the > fschmd watchdog code to it (one of these days). Which raises the question > through which tree should that conversion go in. fschmd is primarily a hwmon > driver, but the changes will only touch the watchdog part... > > I guess it would be best to get the conversion in to Wim's tree, even though > that slightly increases the chance of conflicts. The fschmd driver does not see > a lot of churn, and I think Wim is a better reviewer for watchdog related > patches :) Chances of conflicts are so thin, I vote for getting it through Wim's watchdog tree. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
