Hi @ll, Am 11.05.2012 um 15:38 schrieb Guenter Roeck: > On Fri, May 11, 2012 at 05:23:52AM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote: > [ ... ] >> >>>> So my personal guess is that this bit switches VIN7 to the internal >>>> source just as with the other chips. >>>> >>> Hmmm ... no idea what I should do. Play it safe or assume this is an error >>> in the data sheet ? I tend towards playing safe, but not too much. >>> Guess I am waiting for someone to convince me otherwise... >> >> I would not skip VIN7 until we know more. People will never report >> about missing 5VSB monitoring, but they will report if 5VSB looks wrong. >> >> Do we have any tester for the IT8783F yet? What you could do for now is > > Bjoern Gerhart has been testing it quite extensively. I don't recall > what they do with VIN7, though. > Yes, I have an IT8783F hw configuration with voltage in7 connected to 1.1V nominal. I can give it a re-test with the latest patches applied on beginning of next week against kernel 2.6.32. Then I can also ask if my hw colleagues have an idea about the pin 91 mystery. Björn _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
