On Thu, 2012-03-08 at 11:54 -0500, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Guenter, > > On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 08:26:25 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > We don't really use or need separate device IDs for the various JC42.4 compliant > > chips, so remove them and only retain 'jc42'. > > > > Also update a datasheet references for SE98A, STTS424, and STTS424E02. > > > > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > --- > > Looks good overall. > > > TBD: Should we merge "Prefix" and "Addresses scanned" lines in Documentation ? > > Good question. I'd say yes, my only concern being when it isn't obvious > which datasheet is for which device. OTOH it is already a problem with > the split entries we have today as they are already grouped by > manufacturer. So I'd say just go and merge everything. > Just sent a second version, keeping the manufacturers but moving the Prefix and Addresses scanned information into a separate paragraph. Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
