Hi Guenter, On Thu, 8 Mar 2012 08:26:25 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > We don't really use or need separate device IDs for the various JC42.4 compliant > chips, so remove them and only retain 'jc42'. > > Also update a datasheet references for SE98A, STTS424, and STTS424E02. > > Signed-off-by: Guenter Roeck <linux@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- Looks good overall. > TBD: Should we merge "Prefix" and "Addresses scanned" lines in Documentation ? Good question. I'd say yes, my only concern being when it isn't obvious which datasheet is for which device. OTOH it is already a problem with the split entries we have today as they are already grouped by manufacturer. So I'd say just go and merge everything. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
