On Thu, Feb 23, 2012 at 11:21:09AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Thu, 2012-02-23 at 14:12 -0500, Nikolaus Schulz wrote: > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 05:32:34PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On Wed, Feb 22, 2012 at 05:18:48PM -0500, Nikolaus Schulz wrote: > > > > From: Nikolaus Schulz <schulz@xxxxxxxxxxx> [...] > > > > @@ -363,12 +382,14 @@ static int set_pwm_enable_direct(struct i2c_client *client, int nr, int val) > > > > fanmode |= (1 << F75387_FAN_MANU_MODE(nr)); > > > > fanmode |= (1 << F75387_FAN_DUTY_MODE(nr)); > > > > break; > > > > - case 2: /* AUTOMATIC*/ > > > > - fanmode |= (1 << F75387_FAN_DUTY_MODE(nr)); > > > > + case 2: /* Automatic, speed mode */ > > > > break; > > > > case 3: /* fan speed */ > > > > fanmode |= (1 << F75387_FAN_MANU_MODE(nr)); > > > > break; > > > > + case 4: /* Automatic, pwm */ > > > > + fanmode |= (1 << F75387_FAN_DUTY_MODE(nr)); > > > > > > Might be time to get rid of those extra spaces. > > > > I see no extra spaces. You mean the extra parentheses? I can update > > the patch to drop them. > > > There seem to be two spaces before and after |=. Ah, got it :) > > > > + break; > > > > } > > > > } else { > > > > /* clear each fanX_mode bit before setting them properly */ > > > > @@ -386,6 +407,8 @@ static int set_pwm_enable_direct(struct i2c_client *client, int nr, int val) > > > > break; > > > > case 3: /* fan speed */ > > > > break; > > > > + case 4: /* Automatic pwm */ > > > > + return -EOPNOTSUPP; > > > > > > Should be -EINVAL. > > > > The value 4 is valid as it encodes an existing mode, it's just that this > > code path handles hardware that does not support that mode. Why should > > the code return EINVAL? > > > val is invalid for this hardware. Ok, I consider that a valid argument :) > Also it returned -EINVAL before you > made your changes. That one less so, since before, the value 4 was never valid for any hardware, but it is now for the F75387. But I'm okay making it return EINVAL. Thanks for your review, Nikolaus _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors