On Mon, 2012-01-30 at 14:49 -0500, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Mon, 30 Jan 2012 09:03:59 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 15:04 -0500, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > On Sat, 28 Jan 2012 11:23:53 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 01:37:56PM -0500, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > > Add detection of the National Semiconductor (now Texas Instruments) > > > > > LM96080. It is functionally compatible with the LM80 but detection is > > > > > completely different. > > > > > --- > > > > > Frans, if you want to test this, a pre-patched version of > > > > > sensors-detect is available at: > > > > > http://khali.linux-fr.org/devel/misc/sensors-detect > > > > > > > > Looks good. Should we do the same for drivers/hwmon/lm80.c ? > > > > > > I think so, yes. The LM96080 is different enough to have its own chip > > > name IMHO. The detection in the driver worked for Frans by chance > > > because the limit registers are all set to 0, but in the general case > > > it would fail. > > > > You or me or Frans ? Any takers ? > > I'll do it, no problem. It's only a matter of getting to it, as I had a > busy day. > Sounds good... Thanks, Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
