On Tue, 2011-11-08 at 02:30 -0500, Thierry Reding wrote: > * Guenter Roeck wrote: > > Hi, > > > > On Mon, 2011-11-07 at 05:20 -0500, Thierry Reding wrote: > > > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > --- > > > drivers/hwmon/lm63.c | 2 +- > > > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > > > > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm63.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm63.c > > > index 508cb29..94e373c 100644 > > > --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm63.c > > > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm63.c > > > @@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ static int lm63_detect(struct i2c_client *new_client, > > > return -ENODEV; > > > } > > > > > > - if (chip_id == 0x41 && address == 0x4c) > > > + if ((chip_id == 0x41 || chip_id == 0x49) && address == 0x4c) > > > strlcpy(info->type, "lm63", I2C_NAME_SIZE); > > > else if (chip_id == 0x51 && (address == 0x18 || address == 0x4e)) > > > strlcpy(info->type, "lm64", I2C_NAME_SIZE); > > > > Minor - the new chip should be mentioned in drivers/hwmon/Kconfig and in > > Documentation/hwmon/lm63. > > I don't see how to list this variant meaningfully in the documentation. > Since, as you mention, no functionality specific to the LM96163 is added, > this patch really only adds support for one more lm63 chip. > > > My main concern is that LM96163 supports a high resolution PWM mode. > > Since that mode is much more convenient than the LM63-compatible mode, I > > think it is likely to be enabled in designs using LM96163, and it should > > be supported by the driver if we add support for LM96163. > > Unfortunately our design doesn't use the PWM at all. It is only used for > temperature measurements, so I'm not able to test any of the PWM code. I requested samples for both LM63 and LM96163, so I should be able to test that part. Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
