On Mon, 7 Nov 2011 11:20:58 +0100, Thierry Reding wrote: > Signed-off-by: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > --- > drivers/hwmon/lm63.c | 2 +- > 1 files changed, 1 insertions(+), 1 deletions(-) > > diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/lm63.c b/drivers/hwmon/lm63.c > index 508cb29..94e373c 100644 > --- a/drivers/hwmon/lm63.c > +++ b/drivers/hwmon/lm63.c > @@ -483,7 +483,7 @@ static int lm63_detect(struct i2c_client *new_client, > return -ENODEV; > } > > - if (chip_id == 0x41 && address == 0x4c) > + if ((chip_id == 0x41 || chip_id == 0x49) && address == 0x4c) > strlcpy(info->type, "lm63", I2C_NAME_SIZE); > else if (chip_id == 0x51 && (address == 0x18 || address == 0x4e)) > strlcpy(info->type, "lm64", I2C_NAME_SIZE); Oh, BTW... there's really no reason to reuse the "lm63" name when both chips are not fully compatible. Please introduce a new name for the new chip. It's fairly easy. I've added detection support to sensors-detect: http://dl.lm-sensors.org/lm-sensors/files/sensors-detect I would appreciate if you could try it and report. I would also appreciate if you could provide a dump of your chip's registers (using the i2c-dev driver with i2cdump - part of the i2c-tools package) for my collection. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
