Re: modprobe of dme1737 on a ppc64 system results in kernel Oops

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On 07/22/2011 03:23 PM, Jean Delvare wrote:
Hi Dean,

On Tue, 19 Jul 2011 20:12:55 -0500, Dean Nelson wrote:
I was told that a modprobe of dme1737 on a ppc64 system running RHEL5
would cause the kernel to Oops. And indeed it did. I found this was
also the case on RHEL6, and the latest linux-3.0.

It occurs when:
    dme1737_init() calls
    dme1737_isa_detect(0x2e,&addr) calls
    dme1737_isa_sio_enter(sio_cip=0x2e) calls
    outb(0x55, sio_cip=0x2e)

And outb() goes through some macro transformations into out_8(),
which does a store byte indexed assembly (stbx) instruction. Along
the way the port number (0x2e) is changed into an address to
which the value 0x55 is stored. The address is based on:

    addr = pci_io_base + port      // on RHEL5
    addr = _IO_BASE + port         // on RHEL6 and linux-3.0

With RHEL5 on the system I was running, pci_io_base was set to
0xd000080000000000. And with RHEL6 and linux-3.0, _IO_BASE was also
set to 0xd000080000000000.

Thanks for raising this problem, this is the first time I hear about it.

There are other hwmon drivers that also Oops on a ppc64 system when
modprobed. Some of them encounter the Oops when executing inb()/in_8().
The following are the drivers that I confirmed oops and the args passed
into in_8() or out_8().

    drivers/hwmon/dme1737.ko    out_8(addr=0xd00008000000002e, val=0x55)
    drivers/hwmon/f71805f.ko    out_8(addr=0xd00008000000002e, val=0x87)
    drivers/hwmon/lm78.ko        in_8(addr=0xd000080000000291)
    drivers/hwmon/pc87427.ko    out_8(addr=0xd00008000000002e, val=0x20)
    drivers/hwmon/vt1211.ko     out_8(addr=0xd00008000000002e, val=0x87)

Of these, lm78 is different, the chip is an ISA device, when all other
drivers are for more recent LPC (Super-I/O) devices. It should be fixed
in a similar way as the w83781d driver was fixed: putting the
problematic code inside #ifdef CONFIG_ISA/#endif.

It's been reported that there are a number of other hwmon drivers that
exhibit the same behavior, but I've not confirmed that.

Indeed, f71882fg, it87, pc87360, sis5595, smsc47b397, smsc47m1,
w83627ehf and w83627hf certainly have the same problem.


All three kernels have an isa_io_base variable and where it is
defined in the code is a comment that says: /* NULL if no ISA bus */.
(In RHEL5, defined in arch/powerpc/kernel/pci_64.c; and in RHEL6 and
linux-3.0, it's in arch/powerpc/kernel/isa-bridge.c.) On the system
I was running on it was always NULL.

So how should this issue be resolved? I can think of three
directions one could head in:

    . Don't build these drivers for systems that don't have an ISA bus.

Works for lm78, not for other drivers which don't depend on the ISA bus
(x86_64 has no ISA bus but needs these drivers.)

For the other drivers, I think we should simply not build them on
PPC64, as I don't think they are needed there at all. In fact I am
unsure if any of the affected driver is needed on an architecture not
x86 or x86_64.


    . Make a check for an ISA address and no ISA bus reside in the
      callers to outb()/inb()

Are there any other drivers doing this?

Not that I'm aware of. Just indicating that it is one way to address
the problem (though perhaps not a very good way).


    . Make such a check reside in outb()/inb().

This would be very, very expensive at run-time, so I don't think it is
an option at all.

Agreed. Just listing this means of addressing the problem for
completeness.


I tried adding 'ISA' to the 'depends on' lines for the above
drivers in drivers/hwmon/Kconfig. That worked for the ppc64 system
I was running on, but I don't know if it's really a valid approach.
The various CONFIGs (e.g., 'ISA_DMA_API') and the setting of such on
the various architectures is something that is a mystery to me. But if
there was something that could be used (like 'ISA'), the first option
above would seem to be the simplest one to take.

ISA can't be used for the reason given above, and I am unfortunately
not aware of any other option that could be used instead.

The third option, might look something like...

For CONFIG_PPC64 on RHEL6 and linux-3.0, I found in the following
function arch/powerpc/include/asm/pci-bridge.h:

static inline int isa_vaddr_is_ioport(void __iomem *address)
{
          /* Check if address hits the reserved legacy IO range */
          unsigned long ea = (unsigned long)address;
          return ea>= ISA_IO_BASE&&  ea<  ISA_IO_END;
}

And when I was running on these kernels I found,

    ISA_IO_BASE = 0xd000080000000000
    ISA_IO_END  = 0xd000080000010000

So perhaps DEF_MMIO_OUT_BE(), which is what produces out_8() and is
found in arch/powerpc/include/asm/io.h, could be changed to something
like:

#define DEF_MMIO_OUT_BE(name, size, insn)                               \
static inline void name(volatile u##size __iomem *addr, u##size val)    \
{                                                                       \
         if (!isa_vaddr_is_ioport(addr) || isa_io_base) {                 \
                  __asm__ __volatile__("sync;"#insn"%U0%X0 %1,%0"         \
                          : "=m" (*addr) : "r" (val) : "memory");         \
                  IO_SET_SYNC_FLAG();                                     \
         }                                                                \
}

And the others, like DEF_MMIO_IN_BE(), in a similar way.

This sounds pretty complex, to solve a problem which isn't as far as I
can see.

But I really must say that I know nothing about ppc systems. This was my
first exposure to them. So the above might be pure nonsense. Besides, it
doesn't begin to address the other architectures that might have issues
with reading/writing ISA addresses when there is no ISA bus.

So, again, how should this issue be resolved?

I know nothing about ppc either, but I'm sure we would know if these
systems needed these drivers. So the easy fix is to simply make all
offending drivers depend on !PPC. Or be even bolder and make them
depend on X86. I'm sure we'll know soon enough if any other
architecture is suddenly missing a driver they were using (IA64 maybe)
I'm fine both ways.

I didn't feel very bold, so I went with !PPC. Just posted a patch to
lm-sensors.


And for lm78 we want a specific fix, copied from w83781d (not sure why
this wasn't done already.) I'll do that, I can test this driver.

Thank you.

Dean


_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux