Hi Luca, On Wed, 6 Jul 2011 10:48:43 +0200, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > On Wed, Jul 6, 2011 at 2:34 AM, Jeff Rickman <jrickman@xxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Luca, would that modified F71882FG driver (from ~June last year) be > > useful/helpful here? In my case it was a F71862FG chip where ACPI claimed > > the ports but DSDT suggested something to you. I guess it really depends on > > the DSDT code. BTW, I still use that modified driver on that Jetway NC92-330 > > board and it still works fine even with Fedora Core 15. > > It was an ugly hack :) I modified the driver to access the hwmon chip > using the methods exposed by the firmware instead of letting the > driver touch the chip directly. Unfortunately the hack is very board > specific... I still have to test this approach on a Jetway board of mine with a Fintek F71805F chip. Why do you say this is ugly? Of course it is vendor specific (or even board specific) but so is the asus_atk0110 driver. Wouldn't it be a proper way to deal with the ACPI resource conflict at least on the Jetway boards, and maybe others? If it works then I can't really see a reason to not do it, can you? It seems preferable to acpi_enforce_resources=lax people are using at the moment, at least. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
