On Sat, 22 Jan 2011 12:39:33 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Sat, Jan 22, 2011 at 02:04:21PM -0500, Jean Delvare wrote: > [ ... ] > > > > > > I don't know the status of ipmi integration and ipmi module names. There > > > is the OpenIPMI project, and they have lots of patches to improve ipmi > > > support. Jean may know better than me if/when/how those patches will be > > > integrated into the mainline kernel. > > > > The impisensor driver is abandoned for years. I won't look into it as I > > have many other drivers to work on and I don't have supported hardware. > > > > In the meantime, my recommendation is to use ipmitool. It is _not_ > > integrated with libsensors, but other than that, it should report the > > sensor values properly. > > > How about OpenIPMI ? Any plans to integrate that code into the mainline, > or is that pretty much a parallel effort ? > > Just trying to get an idea where IPMI kernel support is going. Looks like IPMI > is going to be used in a project here, so we may have to support it. I have no idea, sorry. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors