On Tue, Jan 18, 2011 at 05:02:46PM -0500, Anish Patel wrote: [ ... ] > >>> > >>> Chip Register 0xed > >>> emc1043 0x0c .. 0x0f, 0x2c > >>> emc1053 0x3c .. 0x3f > >>> emc1063 0x30 .. 0x33 > >>> > >>> So I wonder if you might really have emc1043 on your board instead of > >>> emc1023. Would that be possible ? > >> its possible, but i just found a spare CPU carrier card and looked at > >> it. the IC is def a 1023. > >> I guess it is possible that i have fake/rebadged 1023. > > Interesting. Should be easy to find out, though. emc1043 has register > > 0x04 with a default value of 0x09. That register does not exist on > > emc1023 and should either return the previously read value or an error. > > emc1043 also has registers 0x29 and 0x2a which don't exist on the > > emc1023. Maybe you can use i2cdump to see what registers the chip > > supports, and send the result to the list. > > > > Thanks, > > Guenter > > > > > > > here is the i2cdump for both ic's > > its pretty strange, i have the dump of what seems to be a 1043, but the part is labeled 1023 > link to imgshack -> http://img692.imageshack.us/img692/1006/20110118165728.jpg > Thought so. On the plus side, we can get support for four chips, not just one... Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
