Re: LM94

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Sat, 15 Jan 2011 22:58:06 -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 15, 2011 at 01:35:06PM -0500, Anish Patel wrote:
> > Hello All,
> > 
> > I have tested the LM94 sensor with the LM93 driver and this override command
> > echo lm93 0x2e > /sys/bus/i2c/devices/i2c-0/new_device
> > 
> I thought about adding the LM94 IDs to the LM93 driver. Problem is that
> the driver does not support the extended features of LM94, so I am not sure
> if that would be a good idea.
> 
> Thoughts anyone ?

As long as the current set of features supported by the lm93 driver
work OK with the LM94, I have no objection (and would even encourage
it). Anybody interested in the extra features can add them later. You
can simply have the driver print a notice at bind time that some
features are unsupported.

-- 
Jean Delvare

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux