Re: Location for thermal drivers

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



On Fri, Nov 12, 2010 at 12:33 PM, Guenter Roeck
<guenter.roeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote:
> I think a better location for the driver would be drivers/thermal.
> drivers/hwmon is not really a good fit, since hwmon support for thermal
> drivers is optional. Potential problem with drivers/thermal is that
> there are no thermal drivers in there (yet), and there does not seem to
> be a maintainer.

What is the difference between a "thermal" sensor and a "temperature"
sensor?  Aren't they the same thing?

Why does drivers/thermal exist if there are no drivers in it and no maintainer?

Phil P.

_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors


[Index of Archives]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux Hardware Monitoring]     [Linux USB Devel]     [Linux Audio Users]     [Linux Kernel]     [Linux SCSI]     [Yosemite Backpacking]

  Powered by Linux