On Thu, Oct 21, 2010 at 10:08:01PM -0400, Nicolas Pitre wrote: > On Thu, 21 Oct 2010, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > > On Sun, 2010-10-17 at 11:50 -0400, Simon Guinot wrote: > > > From: Simon Guinot <sguinot@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > > > Signed-off-by: Simon Guinot <sguinot@xxxxxxxxx> > > > > Acked-by: Guenter Roeck <guenter.roeck@xxxxxxxxxxxx> > > > > I assume this will get pushed through the ARM tree, right ? > > Might be simpler if this is routed along the same path as the core code > it relies upon to avoid dependency ordering issues. There is nothing > particularly ARM specific here anyway. > Fine with me, as long as no one objects. Simon, can you reparent this on top of your patch v3 (or maybe on top of 2.6.36) and re-send it ? For some reason git refuses to apply it for me. Thanks, Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
