On Thursday 14 October 2010, 15:39:50 Jean Delvare wrote: > Yes, I want to ignore it on purpose for simplicity. One reason being > that I have a doubt that the old W83L771W/G actually supports a higher > refresh rate than the new W83L771AWG/ASG does. I don't necessarily > trust the datasheet, as it is inconsistent: it says the default > register value is 08h, then later it claims that the default conversion > rate is 16 Hz, but 16 Hz corresponds to a value of 09h in the table. > Additionally, you'll notice that the W83L771W/G conversion rate table > is shifted by 1 compared to all the other compatible chips - which is > quite suspicious. > > So I assume that the table is wrong in the datasheet. Only if someone > with a W83L771W/G at hand tests it and comes to the conclusion that the > table in the datasheet is correct, will I update the driver accordingly. I surely can test something, but as I'm not into those sensors, I need an advise what and how to test. Regards, Alexander _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
