On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 11:53:27AM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 08:29:55 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > > On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 07:40:57AM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > Looks all sane, thanks for doing this. Shall I commit it, or should I > > > create a developer account and let you commit it? You already have an > > > account for the wiki, letting you commit to the repository is only one > > > configuration line away. So it's as you prefer. > > > > I really prefer the git way of doing things, meaning I prefer to have someone > > else have a close look at my code, and not commit my own junk myself. > > I also never worked with svn before, so I would be a bit concerned about > > screwing up the repository. Not really a good idea to make my first svn commit > > into a public repository. > > SVN is really easy. It's almost the same as CVS if you've used CVS > before. And it's definitely easier than git. > Easier than git - really ? After having worked with git for several years, I am still amazed (or, rather, I am more and more amazed) how easy and fast things are with git. Granted, one problem is that it is also very easy to screw up, which makes it very difficult to use with junior engineers ... > > So let's keep it as is for now, and go ahead and commit. We can revisit that > > when you get tired having to deal with my patches. > > I'm tired already ;) > > Just joking. I'll be glad to review and commit your patches if such is > your desire. > Let's at least stick with it for now. Guenter _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
