On Wed, 7 Jul 2010 08:29:55 -0700, Guenter Roeck wrote: > On Wed, Jul 07, 2010 at 07:40:57AM -0400, Jean Delvare wrote: > > Looks all sane, thanks for doing this. Shall I commit it, or should I > > create a developer account and let you commit it? You already have an > > account for the wiki, letting you commit to the repository is only one > > configuration line away. So it's as you prefer. > > I really prefer the git way of doing things, meaning I prefer to have someone > else have a close look at my code, and not commit my own junk myself. > I also never worked with svn before, so I would be a bit concerned about > screwing up the repository. Not really a good idea to make my first svn commit > into a public repository. SVN is really easy. It's almost the same as CVS if you've used CVS before. And it's definitely easier than git. > So let's keep it as is for now, and go ahead and commit. We can revisit that > when you get tired having to deal with my patches. I'm tired already ;) Just joking. I'll be glad to review and commit your patches if such is your desire. > Any plans to switch to git ? No. The complexity incurred far outweighs the benefits, given the little activity the project has. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
