On Sat, 2010-05-29 at 08:39 +0300, Maxim Levitsky wrote: > On Fri, 2010-05-07 at 17:59 +0800, Huaxu Wan wrote: > > The MSR IA32_TEMPERATURE_TARGET contains the TjMax value in the newer > > processers. > > I know that TjMax on my system is 85, and now coretemp reports wrong > temperatures. > First of all BIOS using stupid tricks actualy reports CPU temperature > through ACPI, and assuming it was correct TjMax is 85. > It also shuts down the system if I 'lie' to it that cpu temperature is > 85C. > > Coretemp was working correctly in 2.6.34 The following patch unbreaks the driver: commit 8ff4f666908dd208a10f1b6b38286303fdb774fc Author: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@xxxxxxxxx> Date: Sat May 29 08:57:09 2010 +0300 coretemp: unbreak tjmax reports on Core2 CPUs Core2 CPUS don't report TjMax, but its not always 100C Signed-off-by: Maxim Levitsky <maximlevitsky@xxxxxxxxx> diff --git a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c index 2988da1..fb100a4 100644 --- a/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c +++ b/drivers/hwmon/coretemp.c @@ -276,11 +276,8 @@ static int __devinit get_tjmax(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c, u32 id, case 0xf: case 0x16: case 0x1a: - dev_warn(dev, "TjMax is assumed as 100 C!\n"); - return 100000; - break; case 0x17: - case 0x1c: /* Atom CPUs */ + case 0x1c: return adjust_tjmax(c, id, dev); break; default: _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
