On Mon, 17 May 2010 08:59:50 -0700, Ray Lee wrote: > On Thu, Apr 29, 2010 at 3:56 PM, Benjamin Herrenschmidt < > benh@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > > Now, maybe the best option is to have instead: > > > > fan[1-*]_discrete_value > > Discrete value > > RW > > > > fan[1-*]_supported values > > List of supported discrete values > > RO > > > > Perhaps a granularity (ie, step-size) instead of a full list of values? A possible addition to the current API, yes. But it may not cover all cases: the step size isn't necessarily constant. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
