Hi! On Tue, May 18, 2010 at 20:50, Huaxu Wan <huaxu.wan@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > On 02:45 Tue 18 May, Dmitry Gromov wrote: >> Hi! >> >> And 90C seems to be good for N200 series of Atom CPUs only - I could not >> find TjMax value published for N330 Dual Core (quite popular one). Intel >> only published Tcase for it: >> http://ark.intel.com/Product.aspx?id=35641 >> So, if for N270 Tcase = TjMax = 90C, then, I'd suggest to use Tcase = 85.2C >> for N330 TjMax value. > > Quoted a sentence from [1], "Unless specified otherwise, all specifications for > the processor are at TJ = 90°C", I believe the TjMax of 330 is 90C too. > Well, that refers for the values in that specific table and entire document (which I went through as well) does not specify TjMax :( Similar document for N270 series does specify TjMax explicitly in Table 14: http://download.intel.com/design/processor/datashts/320032.pdf Another document, "Thermal and Mechanical Design Guidelines" for Atom 300 series: http://download.intel.com/design/processor/designex/320530.pdf specifies Tcase-max = 85.2C Thinking about this a bit, I think Tcase-max should be lower than TjMax, which probably is still 90C. The document itself is a good reading too. Anyway, thank you very much for your help, Huaxu! -- DG NJ _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
