On 09:01 Tue 18 May, Carsten Emde wrote: > Dmitry, > > >>Here comes the current version of the coretemp patches. Huaxu did the > >>initial work; Jean suggested to submit them directly to Andrew. > >> > >>I made some style changes as advised by checkpatch. > >> > >>The patches have been tested successfully on Core 2 Duo and Quad, and on > >>Nehalem and Nehalem/Westmere where temperature readings were plausible and > >>changed with load as expected. When tested on an Atom processor (N270), the > >>temperature values were identical to previous versions of the coretemp > >>module and also changed with load. However, the readings should be higher > >>by 10 to 15C as compared to the outside temperature of the processor. > >>Huaxu, could you check? I would guess TjMax to be 105 instead of 90C in these > >>processors. > >I apologize, if I ask a stupid question, but are you saying that TjMax in > >coretemp.c should be set to higher value than Tcase-max value specified in > >Intel documents? > Hmm, no. I am saying that I would like the reading to be correct. I > have measured the outside temperature of the case with an infrared > thermometer [1] and found it to be higher than the readings returned > by the coretemp module. In all other CPUs I have, the coretemp > readings are higher than the case temperature. > > [1] http://www.osadl.org/uploads/media/IPCworld-2008-4.pdf > Hi Carsten, I have no N270 and infrared thermometer in hand, so I can't check it by myself. I'll find a channel and file this issue to them. Thank you. Huaxu _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
