On Tue, Feb 23, 2010 at 12:20 AM, Hans de Goede <hdegoede@xxxxxxxxxx> wrote: >>> 1) How will you deal with board / produty version (we are going to need >>> these to uniquely identify some boards) >> >> Not sure why this would be an issue..? > > This would be an issue when using: > <some-path>/board_vendor/board_name > > To locate the correct config file, as there is no version present in that > scheme > >>> 2) Are you going to handle having multiple board_name's in the same >>> config file. >> >> Why would this be any problem at all? > > The same, this would mean having multiple copies of the same file when using > the above dir layout. Instead of creating a big dir tree, why not just put all the different config files (which should be named using common sense) into one dir and maintain a text file which points the vendor/model/version/whatever_else to the correct file? Then you can just grep what you're looking for. I'm a fan of not making things harder then they need to be, especially when it can be so simple. ;) _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
