On Mon, Feb 22, 2010 at 10:04:17AM +0100, Hans de Goede wrote:
> Hi Andre,
>
> On 02/19/2010 08:38 PM, Andre Prendel wrote:
> >Hi Hans,
> >
> >here is an updated version of the sensors-config tool.
> >
> >Changes in v2:
> >
> >Now the tool parses the configuration pages from lm-sensors.org to
> >determine the available config files.
> >
> >Further I've introduced some metadata to the config files. For the
> >moment these are
> >
> ># board_vendor: BOARDVENDOR
> ># board_name: BOARDNAME
> >
> >The related files are located under /sys/class/dmi/id. board_name can
> >appear multiple times. So one config file can be used for several
> >motherboards.
> >
> >The config files now will be installed under /var/lib and a matching
> >config will be copied as automobo.conf to /etc/sensors.d.
> >
>
> Sounds good! Although I noticed that sensors-config.py still says:
> config_dir = '/usr/local/share/sensors/conf
You're right. I've missed a "quilt refresh" before sending the patch,
sorry. I will send the correct patch right now.
> >And I added a short script for use at startup. The script looks for an
> >suitable config and installs it otherwise it deletes an existing one.
> >
> >So, this should address most of your comments from last email.
> >
>
> Yes it does. Some remarks sofar (before answering your questions),
> I would really like to see the initscript part of this not depend on
> python. The last time this was discussed (in previous attempt to
> come to a sensors-config tool), the idea was to (abuse) the database
> a bit for this.
>
> So for example my motherboard has:
> board_vendor: "ASUSTeK Computer INC."
> board_name: "M2N-SLI DELUXE"
>
> /var/lib/sensors/conf could then contain a config file named:
> "M2N-SLI Deluxe" (same name as on the wiki)
>
> And then have a symlink (generated on the base of the metadata
> in the config files):
> "ASUSTeK Computer INC.-M2N-SLI DELUXE"
>
> Then the whole dmi info -> config file matching can be done in a
> simple sh script. This will not allow for the wildcard like
> matching you have described, but in my experience that is not
> really necessary. I've been doing a lot of dmi based quirks for
> laptops, and I've seen only one case where the DMI data changed
> on a BIOS update, and in that case we can simply have multiple
> tags in the config file, what we could (and should) do is:
> Strip all beginning and ending whitespace from the dmi info
>
> This is easily doable in sh too.
Just a few words about my ideas for the sensors-config tool.
The tool consists of two parts.
Part 1: Fetch configs from lm-sensors.org and generate a directory layout
in the format:
BOARD_VENDOR/BOARD_NAME e.g. ASUSTeK Computer INC./M2N-SLI DELUXE
Then this layout will be packed to an archive
(configuration.tar.gz). The archive is provided for downloading via
lm-sensors.org.
Part 2: An administration tool to (un)install the archive, list the
available configs (after installation), (un)install a config to/from
CONFIG_DIR and searching for a config using the DMI data.
That means, the tool should be more than a auto-configuration
tool. There should be an expert mode to do things manually. This
could be necessary if there is no matching config but the user wants
to test a similar config.
Nevertheless, we can do the auto-config stuff from a shell script.
At the moment the tool is looking under CONFIG_DIR for a directory
BOARD_VENDOR and into this directory for a file BOARD_NAME. This could
be done as well as from shell script. Yes, we can use sed for regex
matching but with the python way installing the automobo.conf is a
one-liner encapsulated inside the config tool.
> >First question: What do you thing about the header keywords?
> >
>
> I think using the exact same names as under /sys/class/dmi/id
> is a good idea.
Ok, after Jean's email I think we should do so. But I don't like
spaces and some other special chars in filenames. Maybe we can replace
this chars by underscores. But then the matching stuff isn't so easy.
> >Maybe we could choose some of the available configs and add a
> >header. So you and can test the tool by yourself.
> >
>
> Yes, I'll update them myself and give it a try. But before I do that
> I wonder if I have the correct version of the script, above you write:
> > Now the tool parses the configuration pages from lm-sensors.org to
> > determine the available config files.
>
> But in the sensors-config.py you attached I still see:
>
> +configs = {
> + 'ASRock' : ['AM2NF3-VSTA'],
> + 'Abit' : ['AA8-DuraMAX', 'AA8XE-Fatal1ty', 'AI7', 'AN7',
> + 'AN8-SLI', 'AV8', 'AX8', 'Aa7-Max', 'Ag7', 'KN9-Ultra',
> + 'KV8-MAX3', 'Kv8Pro', 'VA-20'],
> + 'Asus' : ['KFN4-DRE', 'M2N-SLI Deluxe'],
> + 'DFI' : ['CFX3200-M2-G-infinity', 'Lanparty NF4 Expert',
> + 'Lanparty UT 790FX'],
> + 'Epox' : ['M1697', 'MF4-Ultra3'],
> + 'Evga' : ['x58-SLI'],
> +}
>
> And this still gets used, did you perhaps accidentally send the old
> version ?
See first comment.
> >Second question: What should we use for the header data?
> >
>
> We should allow the following (for now):
> board_vendor
> board_name
> board_version
>
> sys_vendor
> product_name
> product_version
>
> IOW, pretty much what you have already, and then if we
> go the symlink route (I'm always open to suggestions to do
> things differently), check for the following symlinks
> (in order till one is found) :
> $board_vendor-$board_name-$board_version
> $sys_vendor-$product_name-$product_version
> $board_vendor-$board_name
> $sys_vendor-$product_name
Do we need the symlinks at all if we use the exact dmi vendor/board name?
> >I'd suggest to only use a substring of the real dmi string. The
> >sensors-config tool don't need an exact match of the string.
> >
> >For example
> >
> ># board_vendor: Asus
> >
> >matches for
> >
> >ASUS
> >asus
> >Asus
> >ASUSTeK Computer INC.
> >...
> >
>
> That would work, but requires first reading all configuration
> files into memory and extract the metadata before we can do the
> matching, which as the database grows is going to become slow.
As mentioned above, the tool is looking for the directory BOARD_VENDOR
and a file BOARD_NAME into this directory. If found the file is copied
to /etc/sensors.d as automobo.conf. So if the directoy layout under
/var/lib once is made, the metadata isn't required.
> People won't like us reading say 200 files every startup, esp not
> those people who try to get system startup time down to 5 seconds.
>
> So I think a symlink like approach is better.
>
> There is still one important piece missing here though, besides
> automatically putting a config file in place, we also need to
> make sure the necessary modules get loaded. IOW we need a metadata
> keyword to specify which modules the config needs loaded (and with
> which options if any), and then we need some init script to
> load these modules (probably the same initscript as the
> one doing the config file copying, or we could add the necessary
> entries to /etc/sysconfig/lm_sensors from that script.
Ok, one by one :)
> Regards,
>
> Hans
Thanks,
Andre
> p.s.
>
> Note I have dmi data dumps for a lot of motherboards, ie for
> all abituguru using motherboards. So once we have decided on
> how to handle various things and on the metadata format, I can
> update a lot of the config files in the wiki with the necessary
> headers.
This is a good plan.
_______________________________________________
lm-sensors mailing list
lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx
http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
