On Sun, 17 Jan 2010 22:58:02 +0100, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > On Fri, Jan 15, 2010 at 6:30 PM, Jean Delvare <khali@xxxxxxxxxxxx> wrote: > > Hi Luca, > > > > On Fri, 15 Jan 2010 18:11:53 +0100, Luca Tettamanti wrote: > >> Ugh. The AKT0110 node is totally empty, nonetheless the hwmon methods > >> are available. > >> The driver is failing because the method used to identify the mobo > >> (MBIF) is missing (and the printk isn't verbose enough). > >> I suppose I could relax the check and probe the interface even if it's > >> not possible to id the board. > >> I'll prepare a patch. > > > > Isn't this similar to the problem (and patch!) reported by Juan RP 3 > > days ago? > > > > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2010-January/027606.html > > Yes, same problem. I haven't been able to decode MBIF data, so ATM it's unused. > I'll send a patch in reply to this mail. Jean can you please push it > to Linus for .34? I'll push whatever patch is needed to 2.6._33_. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
