On Sun, 15 Nov 2009 19:57:26 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > On 11/15/2009 05:54 PM, Jean Delvare wrote: > > On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 13:26:21 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > >> Thanks for the feedback. I have tested on 3 dumps I have here, one > >> ADT7475 and two ADT7473. The ADT7475 reports -64°C for temp1 and temp3 > >> and has both fault bits set to 1. The two ADT7473 reports reasonable > >> values for both temp1 and temp3 and have the fault bits set to 0. > >> Assuming that the ADT7473 and ADT7475 are almost the same chip and > >> should thus behave the same, my change would be correct. > >> > >> I have also noticed that Jordan's original code did not have the > >> inversion: > >> > >> http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2008-January/022338.html > >> > >> case FAULT: > >> /* Note - only for remote1 and remote2 */ > >> > >> ret = sprintf(buf, "%d\n", > >> (data->alarms& (sattr->index ? 0x4000 : 0x8000))); > >> break; > >> > >> but it lacked normalization (output value 0x4000 or 0x8000 instead of > >> 1.) Maybe when normalizing the logic was inverted by accident? > >> > >> The few ADT7475 data points I have found on the web suggest that on > >> many boards temp1 and temp3 are not connected. This could explain why > >> the bug went unnoticed so far. Why vendors use these chips, which are > >> specifically designed for automatic temperature-based fan speed > >> control, in designs where they don't bother wiring the thermal sensors, > >> is beyond me. > >> > >> Anyway, I will wait for you to return home and test on your system, > >> before sending the patch to Linus. > > > > Hans, did you have the time to test this patch? > > I did not get around to it sofar, but I had already planned to do it this > evening, so I just have. Your patch seems to be correct when run on real > hardware (and the current code in the kernel is thus wrong). OK, thanks. I'll send the fix to Linus shortly. -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors