On Mon, 9 Nov 2009 13:26:21 +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Hans, > > On Mon, 09 Nov 2009 11:51:54 +0100, Hans de Goede wrote: > > I've a adt7475 on my home development machine in the Netherlands > > (I'm currently in Brno). > > > > I can (and would like to) verify this fix when I'm back home (friday). > > The adt7475 on my machine is used to control an additional fan, and has > > no external temperature sensors connected (AFAIK). > > > > I've tested the original adt7475 driver on this machine, but I may > > have simply out "temp1 ignore" (and temp3) in my sensors.conf missing > > this. > > Thanks for the feedback. I have tested on 3 dumps I have here, one > ADT7475 and two ADT7473. The ADT7475 reports -64°C for temp1 and temp3 > and has both fault bits set to 1. The two ADT7473 reports reasonable > values for both temp1 and temp3 and have the fault bits set to 0. > Assuming that the ADT7473 and ADT7475 are almost the same chip and > should thus behave the same, my change would be correct. > > I have also noticed that Jordan's original code did not have the > inversion: > > http://lists.lm-sensors.org/pipermail/lm-sensors/2008-January/022338.html > > case FAULT: > /* Note - only for remote1 and remote2 */ > > ret = sprintf(buf, "%d\n", > (data->alarms & (sattr->index ? 0x4000 : 0x8000))); > break; > > but it lacked normalization (output value 0x4000 or 0x8000 instead of > 1.) Maybe when normalizing the logic was inverted by accident? > > The few ADT7475 data points I have found on the web suggest that on > many boards temp1 and temp3 are not connected. This could explain why > the bug went unnoticed so far. Why vendors use these chips, which are > specifically designed for automatic temperature-based fan speed > control, in designs where they don't bother wiring the thermal sensors, > is beyond me. > > Anyway, I will wait for you to return home and test on your system, > before sending the patch to Linus. Hans, did you have the time to test this patch? -- Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors