On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 09:19:03PM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > On Thu, 5 Nov 2009 20:29:03 +0100, Andre Prendel wrote: > > On Thu, Nov 05, 2009 at 10:22:03AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > Hi Andre, > > > > Hi Jean, > > > > > On Wed, 4 Nov 2009 20:17:42 +0100, Andre Prendel wrote: > > > > On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 10:11:12AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > > > > > You're welcome. I've made some more minor comments, but in general I > > > > > think your patch series is ready to be merged now. Go ahead! > > > > > > > > I've just merged the patches with the minor changes due to your > > > > comments. > > > > > > Great, thanks. Nothing worth mentioning in CHANGES? > > > > Damn, I forget this every time. Otherwise I think we don't need this > > refactoring in the CHANGES file. IHMO it is'nt interesting for the > > user, is it? > > You don't need to say too much, indeed. But the log is also for us to a > certain extent. Mentioning that cleanups and refactoring happened is a > good hint if anything breaks. Useful when writing the freshmeat > announcements, too. Ok, you have convinced me :) I've committed the CHANGES file a few minutes ago. Regards, Andre > -- > Jean Delvare _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
