On Wed, Nov 04, 2009 at 10:11:12AM +0100, Jean Delvare wrote: > Hi Andre, Hi Jean, > On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 21:01:44 +0100, Andre Prendel wrote: > > Another week another patch series :) > > > > There are two new patches. To make you happy I split up the change of > > the function pointer signature into a separate patch (5/8). Patch 7/8 > > fixes the unhandled return value of idChip (see your comment in Patch > > v2 5/8). I've ignored the strcat() issue for now (also from v2 5/8). I > > hope I don't have missed one of the minor issues. The changes are > > explained in the patches too. > > > > BTW thanks for your effort to review my patches. > > You're welcome. I've made some more minor comments, but in general I > think your patch series is ready to be merged now. Go ahead! I've just merged the patches with the minor changes due to your comments. Thanks, Andre _______________________________________________ lm-sensors mailing list lm-sensors@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx http://lists.lm-sensors.org/mailman/listinfo/lm-sensors
